detection engineering intermediate The 57,000-Rule Illusion: What Changed in Public Detection Content 57,602 rules across 25 public repos: where content is growing, where ATT&CK coverage breaks down, and why raw counts deceive. Oct 28, 2026 · 7 min read #detection-engineering #mitre-attack #sigma #yara
detection engineering advanced Your Board Doesn't Care About T1078: A Detection Coverage Model in the Language of Business Risk 216 technique IDs are not a decision surface. Translate detection coverage into named threats against crown-jewel assets, in dollars, with drill-down. May 25, 2026 · 16 min read #metrics #detection-program #coverage #leadership
threat intel advanced AI Agents as Attack Surface: Detect the Action, Not the Prompt An AI agent is a non-human identity with an opaque decision layer. You can't detect the prompt injection, so watch what the agent's credential does. Apr 15, 2026 · 13 min read #ai-agents #ai-security #llm #prompt-injection
threat intel intermediate T1078.004 45 to 1: Non-Human Identities Are Your Biggest Detection Blind Spot You have ~45 non-human identities per human, and the signals your detection runs on (MFA, impossible travel, login geo) don't exist for any of them. Mar 15, 2026 · 16 min read #nhi #identity #cloud #ai-agents
detection engineering advanced The Detection Funnel: How Your 80% ATT&CK Coverage Becomes a 6% Catch Rate ATT&CK coverage % looks good in board decks. Here's why it compounds into a ~6% actual catch rate, and what Threat Detection Coverage actually means. Mar 5, 2026 · 11 min read #hot-take #metrics #detection-program #coverage